A Literal World is Not a Real World

A  friend and  I  had a discussion the other day about the great influence of Paul in the Christian religion.. He mentioned that Paul influenced Christianity in some ways more  than Jesus did. According to the Bible, Paul was to be Jesus’s voice as Jesus himself wrote nothing. As a practicing Jew, Jesus knew the prophesies that the old testament contained. I added that Paul’s influence has extended to all of western society.

It seems to me that the truth can not be transferred to another through words and concepts.Words and concepts are metaphoric in that they can only point to the truth
If one is not capable of  the insight of the original speaker and what he was intending  to convey they might in their rewriting of it turn it into their own creation influenced by their own limited perception, out of an ignorance of the intended metaphor. Often that creation as it was with Paul was more literal, an example being that Jesus is literally the saviour and you must believe in him and free of sin to be saved. I can’t help believe that if there was an actual person of the Jesus that is being referred to he would have understood the nature of language and probably did not intend such a literal meaning.

These same dynamics seem to occur in all the religions especially as they become institutionalized. We look for something more secure and literal in life. Look what we do to economics. It becomes something religious in the same sense, but we claim that it follows scientific laws and principles that are absolute.

People have great difficulty sorting out the concept from the truth. I see this occurring in Buddhist thinkers as well and I am having a similar encounter with a Shambala group that I have been involved in. Our direct experience of life, if we can come to experience it beyond the literal and if we can differentiate the word from the symbol and metaphor is the best teacher of life and the thing that will awaken us to a more full life. In my own experience it  is as  Buddhists teachings suggest that when you are awake,to life,  throw away the teaching and that the word, concept, belief is not the truth. In Zen  there is a saying “the finger-pointing towards the moon” which suggests that our concepts can point towards something but that they are not that thing that they are pointing to.

In embracing a faith grounded in doubt of what we have been taught and have learned to be true we can come to have a more direct examination and experience of what is true that really can not be communicated or transferred through teaching. Through teaching we can teach relative truths and help to create an environment that is conducive to waking up but that is the limit of our teaching.

I think that it is partly what Chogyam Trungpa referred to as spiritual materialism. That is that to believe that we can be in possession of knowledge, beliefs and/or concepts that are true in an absolute sense and that they can be obtained and possessed.and passed on to others is an illusion. In an awake state of consciousness we eventually come to the realization that language is a tool but that it is metaphoric and descriptive and that it is best at illustrating relative truths. It is something like that. I am not fixed in what I know and am open to others input. And I find that I learn best through an authentic, direct open sharing and exploring that uses words and concepts as tools to express but that  are limited in their ability to capture the essence and whole of what they are intending to describe.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s